Philosophic Reasoning of 2000 years

Philosophical reasoning of 2000 years is killing the Earth

(Extract of Book "PLADESNIEKANT")

One of the topics in my work is the question: What effect do philosophical theories have on our reality - as it is today? We overlook a history of over 2000 years of philosophical thinking since PLATO/SOCRATES over DESCARTES, HUME, KANT, SCHOPENHAUER, NIETZSCHE, HEIDEGGER, SARTRE to SLOTERDJIK and HABERMAS. What do all these philosophers have in common?

They have in common that their apparent interest in the functioning of the World - as a whole - has definitely no priority. Neglected too are reasonable answers to some fundamental questions: How to live in peace, how to understand where we come from, where is the position of our Sun-system in the universe, why we do what we do, how can our species survive, why must everything turn worse and worse towards the end of the history of Homo sapiens? No: these topics were neglected by our philosophers. They mention them solely apart with an easy-going mind. However, what all these philosophers have in common is what I call in my work: "Human species in heaven - and the Earth in the Asshole". This anthropocentric view on humanity will cost the life of billions of people towards the end of our existence, before the bell will ring on 1st day of the year 2100.  In fact, all our little-minded "experts" and "savants" have always put the almighty brains of human beings in the centre of their commentaries and they never really asked for the interest of other animals, the plants, air and water and the living system on Earth as a whole. The real mechanics of survival never were important to these men of genius.

Abstractedness rules the World

Not Concreteness - Abstractedness rules the World

Many people get annoyed when I tell them that 99 percent of world population do not understand the mechanics of the world, because they have no idea of abstractedness. This is also true for very intellectual folks like Habermas, GW Bush, Ronald Reagan, Putin, Obama and most of bankers, CEO and Dynamite Prize Holders.

Let's look into this problem of making distinctions between concreteness and abstractedness:

CONCRETENESS

Obama, GW Bush and Margaret Thatcher and Greenspan and Murdoch and the other wide over 99 percent of folks, pretend all the restricted time of their existence the following:

The planet Earth can be ruled on bases of concrete theories of philosophers and theorists of economics, like Adam Smith, von Hayek, Machiavelli, Kant, Darwin, Einstein, Keynes, Friedman, Popper, Sartre, Krugman, Habermas and some other thousands of "geniuses", recognized as such by ordinary folks and the Dynamite Prize Committee.

Origins and Effects

Origins and Effects - Actions and Reactions

Not the Elite of VIPs in the World, not the politicians, not the scientists, not the cultural folks, not the bankers, not the philosophers and no Popes of the world know the difference between origins and effects - or actions and reactions.

Take some Examples of rather great importance on fatality of future Humanity:

A - 9/11 - U.S. crime of the year 2001:

Is 9/11 of the year 2001 in New York an action or a reaction? Is it more some sort of ORIGIN of future matters, or more the EFFECT of past policies and politics?

No one knows. But all know: Out of blue heaven, without a cause, came some terrible Arabs, same Islam brothers, stole 4 Airplanes and crashed into 2 sky-scrapers. the Pentagon and missed the White House. Great? Great, because now, GW Bush could start his wars for oil in Iraq, the one for American influence over Asia and Russia in Afghanistan. The White House rats could start their plans to get all oil and gas of the Saudi Region under control, some craziness in the rotten minds of Bush advisers Rove and Cheney and Rumsfeld - to distort your attention, whereas Lady Shuffling Rice made a fuss about and in conjunction with Israeli - in order to hide on what side in Arabia the U.S. governments have always been since 1945.

On the other side, the American influence has been there long time ago - East of Jerusalem, with assisting Saddam Hussein during a ten year War against Iran, interferences and lies in favour of Israel and to the charge of Palestine, crashing Lebanon, looking away in Rwanda, playing human rights with social murder Tribunals when spitting of graves of tortured folks in Chile, Argentina, Yugoslavia, building up some fine armies around Mullahs, their Taliban and Al Qaeda and Bin Laden against Soviets in Afghanistan, politics with the Shah of Persia and the western style of murdering capitalism against the archaic life from Algeria down to Indonesia.

What is ORIGIN - what is ACTION ----- and what is EFFECT - and what is REACTION?

Do the idiotic folks and Chiefs of State in the West know? Do the criminal and pseudo-religious Macho forces in the East, going against women and poor folks know what they are doing?

The world of intellectuals is one big mess - and no one knows anything. And the masses keep quiet, believing their Masters of Universe would know what they are doing.

The End of Humanity

All of us are living in a torturing and killing World

We all live in a world of PERPETRATORS and are identifying us with the powerful, the rich and the influent persons in this World. The other truth is, that we all are living our reality in a VICTIMS-World - have always been and always will be. We live in a perpetrators world but in fact 99 percent of human beings have in all times been victims of the eternally same horrible creatures.

Listen to the following sound:

"We tortured young people to death with all possible methods: Some were burnt to death on a net of metal made glow by electricity. Some other students or journalists were slowly drowned to death over hours. But we were never satisfied in our lust to kill as painfully as ever possible. With the consent and knowledge of CIA and government, my torturing monsters did with the victims whatever they wanted. One of the worst method of killing was to widen the anus of men or the vagina of women with burners and than chasing rats in these openings. The rats ate themselves literally through the intestines of the victims. The shouting and yelling had no end and we laughed our heads off during the time our victims slowly died from pain…."

Value of Cultures

Value and Meaning of CULTURES

Reading recently an article about the arguments of a writer called Terry Eagleton, how Cultures in the world changed its importance and face during the last centuries.

Although there is not much to be put forward about his superficial views on the value of cultural life, I guess he missed all important points, as normally intellectuals do when talking of high matters, like politics, economics, civilisation, religion, philosophy or in this case of "Culture".

Now - THIS is my view on the history of culture, as seen by the western world

Was it in former times something for intellectuals who liked high music of Bach or Beethoven, or literature of Shakespeare and Dante, or read works of Plato and Kant, or tried to find relief in higher spirits, this meaning of culture started to change fundamentally during the last 200 years, and more and more in funny directions during the last 100 years, when Marx communism and Hitler conservatism came into play.

Socialists and Communists around Karl Marx

For intellectuals of the left, culture became more and more an argument to justify a higher value of human rights, freedom for the masses, equal justice of all, the fortune of state should belong to each one and not the an elite of richest conservative forces having all the power on armies, on companies, on banks, on stock exchanges and all the rest.

Junk about Sartre and Camus

LIBERATION Junk - Sartre and Camus

"Liberation" is a very intellectual newspaper from Paris. And in view of the fact that Albert Camus died on January 4, 1960, all French Media are full of praise for the literature and philosophy of Albert Camus.

And of course, Camus cannot be judged as the new Hero of intellect of the past 20th Century, without being compared to over-father Jean-Paul Sartre. Let's do it again, the comparing - but first have a close look on other very dull philosophers of the world.

- OLD GREEKS - What is the world?

Plato, Socrates, Aristoteles - The old Greeks were not dull. Considering that not even bicycles were running on the small and dusty paths of the land and no idea of electricity, of canons, rifles, atom work or explosion of mass population, the start in philosophy was just great. The level of thinking by the Old Greeks was high-end and should have been a start for higher investigation of the role of the universe, of nature, of the planet Earth and of humans, in relation to its treasures and co-creatures.