You are driving your car, on the way to an erotic adventure, your spirits are full with pre-meditation of what's going to happen - and all of a sudden, a child runs before your car. You think of letting the child survive, go on the brakes and stop the car. What happened? Your brain can impossibly have two thoughts at the same time. Not even René Delavy can. It is absolutely impossible to think of love and - simultaneously - the brakes of a car.
This is important to know when following the idea about the "hybrid" brains. About 99,999 percent of world population have a hybrid brain, which means that normal people can think in alternatives, but never in alternatives of thousands of possibilities. I think that Descartes and Blaise Pascal where able to this achievement, and I prove below, that René Delavy belongs also to this category.
What more is: 6 billion people heading forward to 7 billion suffer from the disease of "Hybrid brain". And this will prove to be deadly; it will cost the existence of the species Homo sapiens. And it does not help if a handful of "Pascal or Descartes" are living, perhaps, in post-modern times, being reasoning in thousands of alternatives when regarding at any topic you may name.
Well, it may be an achievement to think just in one alternative: Believing in a God or not doing so, believing in a Pope or in a General, believing in Bush or Hillary, believing in bicycles or cars, believing in money, stock exchanges, casinos or in the forgotten power of nature, making useless distinctions in periods of welfare and periods of depression - this all is without any further importance with regard to the total effects on the local universe of our Earth. Better would be, believing in the two perspectives - and to extend it to several thousands. But most of the people cannot even think in perspectives, they live like robots and function in the way, his "superiors" want him or her to function.
If we want to save our platform if living, our Earth, including our species, we must learn to read those who have the unique capacity of building up chains of causes and effects (Ursachen-Wirkungs-Ketten) - instead of alternatives. I admit that this matter seems complex, but it isn't when we go in applying it into practice.
A. Hybrid-Brains in Techniques
Take the hybrid-motor for cars: Al Gore, Jared Diamond, WEF and WSF, IPCC, attac, Greenpeace and other stupid politicians, scientists or organisations believe that here would be a key for better environment, all newspaper are, after the IPCC-Report, full of that idea. I say: That's bullshit, a dead-born matter (Totgeburt). Why? Because using batteries and electricity for cars will prove to have been the worst possible application of energy on Earth. We have already not enough current for houses, industry, trains, cooling and heating systems, all house and other machineries, computers and play-stations possible - and a crazy man wants to make run as many cars as possible on the planet with that diamonds-stuff? Crazy and dead-born idiocy! It will never function - in great masses, because there is "The law of the great figure" (Gesetz der grossen Zahl). And the maxim of great masses is the major problem with growth, energy, car driving, with having thousands of planes any minute of the day at the sky, with China and his adventure into its future collapse, due to the coming dead-end of a bankruptcy of the United States of America
B. Hybrid-Brains in Economics
You want to know about one of the greatest criminal acts in economics? It's the perversion with Cheap-Airlines. They use up all energies that will become priceless soon, misuse existing infrastructure paid by nations by billions, like airports, streets, trains, transports etc., they make people work like slaves for an apple and an egg and they destruct the ecological basis of our world. And all bankers and other idiots at stock exchanges and chiefs of states applaud like idiots and the clients take risks in scrap-machines, they would never take, if they would be forced by a Nation to take similar risks. And all this is the heritage of crazy theorems, started with Adam Smith, continued over Karl Marx, von Hayek, Keynes, Max Weber and worst of them all - Milton Friedman and Karl Popper, pushing with unbelievingly mad optimism all vane rules of self regulation, producing by nature an increasing chaos, over which not one organisation or person in the whole world could effect proper controls anymore. Everything has gone mad, but we all agree with life-conditions as they are developing, in conformity with major "hybrid-brains" that allege: "Everything goes better from day to day." The pragmatists made believe all managers and CEO, including "normal" politicians and their folks, that we can increase growth, profits and happiness forever, without destroying at the same time our planet of living, our platform, our Earth. This is craziness of the highest category imaginable - and unfortunately never corrected by the reasoning of philosophers. But about those cracks of "intelligence", I will give an opinion further on. We are running in our own self-destruction with open eyes, happily eating caviar and drinking nectar, at least the richest between us, whereas the express train - or better the Cheap-Airlines - is heading into a brick-wall with great letters on it: "Dead-end of feasibilities created by Homo stupidentis". By the way: Did you know that around the year 2000, the greatest philosopher of the world must be, by principle and in union-of-person, the best accountant of the world, because the whole functioning of commerce, like industry, banks, insurances, services etc., is fully dependent upon knowledge and mastering accounting principles on highest level? There would not be such a thing like economy without the measuring of it, worldwide, with means of figures and accounting in annual statements and their analyses.
C. Hybrid-Brains in Politics
It's all the same: When solely reasoning in alternatives such as US-Democrats or Republicans, neo-capitalistic Putin or a Marxist government, Brazil's Lula da Silva or Cuba's Fidel Castro, socialist regimes or fascist dictatorships, Pinochet or Bachelet. It's all the same. Why? Well, everything is a question of what we are measuring. If we think of marginal differences about daily politics, it does perhaps matter what party or person or regime governs a nation. From the point of view of growth, destruction of environment, ecological blindness, using up all energies and resources of the world within ten generations, all these fundamental questions for our survival are absolutely of no interest for persons who represent our "Skunks of power" (see my Editors Letter "Skunks of Power" govern our World). In fact, we could extend the stupidity of politicians by the one of CEO, philosophers, theorists in economics, heads of NGOs, bankers, UNO and any other organisations or persons, having some power on Earth. One of the greatest mistakes in the heads of the world-population is the belief that anything can change by changing regimes or persons. Now, read the following sentence one 1000 times: You may take a Conference like WEF in Davos or G-8, take World Social Forums of any kind - if all have about the same degree of intelligence you cannot accumulated the issues, you only get an average of overall stupidity. But take one universal genius, not being philosophers in the common sense of that term, as were individuals like Plato, Galileo, da Vinci, Keppler, Blaise Pascal, René Descartes or Delavy and you will have resolutions that exceed in its consequences the one of any World-Forum by the factor of 1000. You should learn to make the distinction by reading the following paragraph.
D. Hybrid-Brains in Philosophy
The great philosophers were never those who we believed they are. They have produced, with very few exceptions like Plato, Rousseau or Russell, pure rules of human behaviourism. It was always a question of how should we handle as humans to be successful, to be loved, to be superior to other animals, to govern the world as such, to become some sort of Gods. Never ever, with very little exceptions, the Globe as platform of living, was of importance and therefore, the philosophers pushed forward the idea, Homo sapiens can become a mass-product with 6 billion heads, using up resources, oil, gas, energy and all the rest, can transform it into deadly poison, thus destruction air, water, grounds - and the resources themselves. The reason for this craziness lies not only with the religious leaders of all faiths in the World, it lies with philosophers, technocrats, scientists, theorists of technology, economics, logics and all the rest, solely here to fulfil American dreams. And this was so already in the Middle-Ages, in times of Enlightenment and became its Peak from 1900 onwards to "Modern Times" as we have now in the year 2007. We all have become blind, crazy, money-oriented, believing in shares and bonds, in scrap of any sorts - and at the same time are destroying our reality in a speed largely over the one of Einstein's light; he also pushed this development of "Greatness and Vanity", when he tried to stop early Hitler by giving the atom bomb to some other Hitlers and Stalins. And today? We have only "Hybrid-Brains" of Pragmatics all over the Globe: Huntington , Fukuyama
E. Hybrid-Brains in Culture
There is not much to be said on this topic: The Western ideologies mentioned above have marginalized all other cultures, colonialists have destroyed one by one. Instead of leaving any new-born Jesus in the European churches, they grinned about cultures believing in the value of nature, plants, animals, water - all of which today are going to leave us, by pure idiocy to those representatives of Western philosophers and popes that meant to know, how the Universe functions. And today, far too late, we all are shedding tears of crocodile about a lost paradise, that would have been possible, had we learnt some lessons from Red Indians, Incas or other believers in the power of nature, the importance of taking care of resources, plants, air, water and all the globe as such, since we have only one planet. The ones who would have taught us how to survive with much less people than 6 billion were taken for little numbers, for stupids - and they were decimated by force, by a hegemony of power that we can today still experience with the USA, dictating US-capitalistic neo-liberalism as a basic principle of the world that is on the way of making some individuals or nations very rich and over 90 percent very poor, just before even the richest will also have lost everything. And China, India and Russia just now copy a model that in the long run will prove to have been one thing only: deadly.
F. Hybrid-Brains in Media
Here we come to the worst chapter of all: The media should have had the task of giving us the chance to think in higher degrees. With the help of almost all editing companies of the Word, especially idiots like Rupert Murdoch, Berlusconi, Bertelsmann, Disney, Springer and many other runners for money, we were misused to become dull and duller. Same thing with TV and Radio stations. Not the intelligent people on Earth became the respect they deserve but the always greater part of the dullest part of males and females on Earth, having just the wish of being amused, entertained and "informed" on the lowest possible intellectual level. And there is no distinction between written press or online pages in the net. It's all shreddering daily news, 24 hours on 24, no distinction of matters of importance and gossip. The stupidest president of all times - and similar figures on top of each media-set. The universal geniuses, still capable of overlooking the given chaos, do not get the slightest chance of being heard, and when they are published, they are shreddered through quicker as Einstein could spell out his most famous formula. The 99 percent of "hybrid brains" shout "Hurrah", when they hear on TV or read in press that shares of a Cheap-and-Scrap-Airline has exploded due to exploding passenger figures - and next infotainment being the IPCC-report complaining about fast deteriorating life-conditions. So "normal" participants in mad-gone life cannot even bring one alternative of self destruction in a proper relativity in his brain, mislead by education and false theorems of thinking. Such a world-society is lost forever.
Overall Conclusions
Considering all the arguments above, some of you may realize that 6 billion brains are functioning according to the rules of hybrid-thinking - instead of the art of universal views on the major issues of future humanity, Blaise Pascal around 1600 and René Delavy around 2000 have written about, mentioning thousands of perspectives that show, why we have only one chance of surviving, within the next 50 years: It's to change to 100 percent any kind of superficial reasoning of these days on Earth - in favour of a scheme of survival on our planet, in maintaining the rest of resources that are going to end just now. The world's total volume of air can be placed in a very small bullet, just covering Middle-Europe, and it is already polluted to the max, the mass of all water on Earth can be put in a bullet covering Spain, the natural resources are almost gone, transformed in scrap and poisoning air, the climate change is just now going to produce a huge rocking-chair of increasing dryness, water-floods, storms, monster-waves, snowfall and coldness, never ever experienced in the past. Forget the few degrees of increase in temperature! The major threat is this "Unbalancing of weather" all over the globe, because we shall never be able to leave this planet to find a better world.
It's time to change our philosophical view and our style of life, which in fact has already gone far beyond the "Point of no return". IPCC did not understand that the whole scheme is not a matter to be measured by scientology which is exactly the reason why we are lost. In "Orakel 2099" I have written more about environment, false developments in politics and economics than a million of square-heads, working for IPCC, could be able to bring to paper. Have we lost all chances for the generations to come, for all children, Homo sapiens would have had onwards the year 2000? It's up to you and than think, if under these circumstances a living for future humans would be desirable. Well, I rather think, that we have all done well so far. Much more of an intellectual misery about our future cannot be burdened upon our own children. And let's the universal reasoning stop here and give the liberty of free-thinking to the human masses of "Hybrid-Brains". Then, the process of unpreventable collapses will not take a long time.
Want to learn about possible "Ways out of danger"? Okay, go into page "rene delavy" and read the Editors Letter "The World will be "done" by the year 2025".
